Essential Features of IT Portfolio Management Software
IT portfolio management software should be able to see and plan for potential scenarios, link strategy to goals, and clear financials. Leaders can use it to plan for risk, keep teams aligned, and minimize rework.
- Intake: A clean intake process turns ad hoc asks into clear demand. It should capture scope, value, risk, and need up front, as well as route reviews, and log choices. Strong intake cuts noise, speeds triage, and keeps shadow work from slipping in.
- Prioritize: Ranking tools are useful in helping teams pick the right mix of work, not just the most urgent work. They consider value, risk, and deadlines to help maintain focus and make fair choices.
- Roadmaps: Roadmaps turn a long list into a plan. Teams can quickly see when work is expected, what should move first, and what slips. Good roadmaps let you switch views by team, app, or goal without rework.
- Capacity: Capacity views align with real staff time and skills. They show gaps early, guide reassignment, and help set start dates. Solid capacity planning ensures that hiring and vendor partnerships are done accurately and avoids overload and burnout.
- Scenarios: What-if plans let you test changes with low risk. You can model new caps, cuts, adds, or date shifts, then see the impact on load, finish dates, and goal fit. They help you defend plans when facts shift.
- Financials: Funding views link work to budget, cost, and forecast. They help track planned versus actual spending and they can flag when spending is exceeding budget. Transparent financials support steering talks, trim waste, and keep audit trails tight.
- Strategy Link: Goal ties show why each item exists and what it should yield. They connect work to OKRs, outcomes, or cap maps, so rank-and-cuts make sense. They build trust and keep teams from drifting.
- Dependencies: These show which blocks depend on which across teams, apps, and vendors. They clarify handoffs, shared risks, and key deadlines to prevent last-minute problems or miscommunication.
- Dashboards: Dashboards turn raw data into a shared truth for leads and teams. They roll up health, load, risk, and spend with drill-down when needed. Strong dashboards reduce the need for constant slide deck revision and keep status updates efficient and reliable.
Align IT investments with business goals, improve resource allocation, plan capacity, and more with IT portfolio management services.
Smartsheet
IT Portfolio Management by Smartsheet is an intelligent work management platform that helps IT PMOs turn intake, projects, and live data into one clear portfolio view. Teams run multi-tier intake with approvals, spin up governed projects with Control Center, track capacity in Resource Management, and share live dashboards, templates, and AI-guided insights.
Smartsheet Features:
- Multi-tier intake with automated approvals
- Control Center that automates project governance
- Resource Management to track capacity and utilization
- Dashboards that show real-time status, risk, and financials
- PPM templates with AI accelerate setup
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Smartsheet links intake lists, project workspaces, staffing views, and portfolio dashboards into one system that mirrors how work already flows. Portfolio templates, Control Center blueprints, and Resource Management capacity views all help to keep demand, people, and delivery visible in one place.
That design fits teams that want control rather than a fixed PPM suite. Extra sheets and admin work may be required for what-if capacity scenario modeling, budget rollups, and WorkApps tagging.
Learn more about IT portfolio management solutions to minimize uncertainty and risk and maximize portfolio value.
Asana
Asana is a work management platform that helps IT teams organize initiatives, track demand, and coordinate delivery across portfolios and projects. It layers AI-driven status summaries, Universal Workload, Smart Goals, rollup formulas, and AI Studio so managers can see progress, staffing strain, and strategic impact.
Asana Features:
- Portfolios with AI-assisted status summaries
- Universal Workload for cross-functional capacity forecasting
- Smart Goals linked to measurable strategic outcomes
- Portfolio rollups and custom fields that can be combined in dashboards and reports
- AI Studio for intelligent intake and workflows
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Asana helps IT teams steer initiatives across products, platforms, and shared services. Teams send requests through AI Studio, review AI status in portfolios, and track workload, budgets, goals, and rollup scorecards. This helps them see progress, staffing strain, and strategic impact across many streams of work.
Asana suits organizations that value collaboration, a flexible structure, and AI-driven status updates over rigid control. Teams may still require setup for allocations reporting, and they may have to map cross-project dependencies manually and extend financials through optional modules.
Clarity
Clarity is a strategic portfolio management solution that connects strategy, investments, people, and spend in one system. It supports top-down strategic roadmaps, capacity-driven portfolio planning, and detailed financial tracking. It helps IT leaders align work with goals, staff, and budgets.
Clarity Features:
- Strategic roadmaps with timeline, board, and grid views
- Centralized resource and staffing workspaces
- Investment hierarchies linking products, projects, and value streams
- Complete financial planning across portfolios and work
- Objectives workspace tracing OKRs to funded investments
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Clarity helps IT portfolio teams build structured roadmaps, rank work, and align demand with resources. Portfolios grow from requests into funded initiatives, with schedules, time, and outcomes, so steering groups can see impact across applications, products, and shared services.
Modern UX roadmaps and hierarchies might start to take over classic portfolios and stay top-down. Multi-currency totals require additional checks and roadmap lists lack clear plan markers.
ClickUp
ClickUp is an all-in-one productivity and project management platform that many IT PMO teams use to run portfolio work. It links intake paths, workloads, and goals in a single workspace. PMO dashboards, shared views, and configurable fields support portfolio tracking and reporting.
ClickUp Features:
- PMO dashboards can provide roadmap-style visualization
- Workload, Timeline, and Gantt views share common project data
- Custom fields and formulas model IT governance attributes
- Goals and Portfolios support strategic tracking using linked project metrics
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
ClickUp brings IT demand, projects, and operations into one workspace, where you shape it with spaces, folders, and views. IT PMO teams use it to route intake, steer portfolios, track workloads, and share dashboards that can connect roadmaps, risks, and delivery metrics across products and services.
That reach suits teams that want one place for IT intake, planning, and status, but it demands clear structure and upkeep. Portfolio views might need manual refreshes; cards stay simpler than task views; goal-based roadmaps and maturing baselines mean many leaders may still lean on sheets for final checks.
Jira Align
Jira Align is an enterprise agile planning platform that connects strategy, funding, and delivery across large Jira-based organizations. It centralizes strategic roadmaps and links objectives to epics and PIs. It provides leaders with live insight into funding plans, PI timelines, portfolio spend, and cross-team dependencies.
Jira Align Features:
- Strategic snapshots that connect goals, themes, and funding views
- Portfolio Room that links funding, PI timelines, and epic progress
- Enterprise roadmaps to plan strategic work across timeframes
- Financial views to track budget and forecast
- Dependency boards that reveal cross-team risks early
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Jira Align combines strategic themes, budgets, and Jira work in one place. Portfolio managers can review demand, stay on top of dependency workflows, check team load, and track progress across products and value streams.
To reach that value, you need clear rules, clean Jira data, and a stable agile model. Managers may have to keep individual staffing, team roadmaps, and ledger-grade accounting in other systems. Jira Align doesn’t provide double-entry accounting and planning and views are often high-level.
Meisterplan
Meisterplan is a visual project portfolio and resource management solution that many IT PMOs use to link roadmaps to resources. Teams work from one live timeline, a staged intake board, and scenario-based capacity views that link projects with clear goals and funding.
Meisterplan Features:
- Interactive portfolio timeline combining projects, resources, and financials
- Kanban-style board for a staged project pipeline
- Scenario comparison across project schedules, costs, and resources
- Portfolio-level resource planning for long-term capacity
- Views for aligning projects with strategic objectives
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Meisterplan is where portfolio teams plan real work against real people and money. They work from a live timeline and a simple pipeline board, move projects along as facts change, and rely on scenarios to test options before committing to dates, staffing, and goals.
Users must weigh trade-offs. Meisterplan typically uses Excel, imports, or BI tools for fine-grained financial views. It can require API‑ or connector‑based links for ERP data. Its strongest scenario capabilities are at the portfolio level, and some project fields remain global across scenarios.
Microsoft Planner
Microsoft Planner is a unified work management tool in Microsoft 365 that combines tasks, projects, and lightweight portfolio tracking. Higher tiers support portfolios that roll up premium plans, a Timeline view with task dependencies, and Copilot help for intake, task suggestions, and clear status summaries.
Microsoft Planner Features:
- Portfolios that roll up premium plans into portfolio overviews.
- Timeline view that supports dependencies, but limited critical path.
- Copilot to assist with task suggestions and progress summaries
- Teams integration that embeds plans directly within channels
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Microsoft Planner combines task management with lightweight project and portfolio views inside Microsoft 365. Teams capture work on boards, expand it into structured plans with dates and owners, and track progress via portfolios, Timelines, and basic charts, with Copilot assisting planning and updates.
There are gaps for mature portfolios. Planner still leans on a task-centric scheduling model. Some licenses lack cross-plan capacity views, and its basic cross-plan analytics may be basic compared to enterprise tools. Custom field caps, shallow baselines, and limited restore or audit history may encourage organizations to supplement Planner with Power BI or another portfolio system.
monday.com
monday.com is a cloud-based work management platform that teams use to coordinate projects, resources, and portfolios in one place. It provides templates and dashboards that can aggregate multiple projects into a central portfolio view for shared tracking.
monday.com Features:
- Portfolio templates with connected project boards
- Real-time dashboards for portfolio health and status
- Customizable columns, automations, and portfolio templates
- Portfolio boards that display key project information with configured automations
- All Projects Dashboard that aggregates portfolio metrics centrally
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
monday.com combines project lists, resource views, and goals in a connected workspace for cross-functional teams. Users can plan boards and dashboards around intake, review steps, and steering talks, then roll that data into portfolio views that stay in sync as projects move and reveal trends, risk, and demand.
That flexibility comes with tradeoffs for portfolio work. Teams can design manual scoring and capacity models to handle workload limits and the lack of native program hierarchy. Many teams add marketplace apps for deeper resource insight, which suits groups ready to curate their own stack.
Planview
Planview is a strategic portfolio and project management solution that connects demand, plans, people, funding, and technology in one place. It supports strategic roadmaps, capacity and funding scenarios, and AI-powered analysis that delivers insights for planning and execution across portfolios.
Planview Features:
- Strategic roadmaps link investments, capabilities, and outcomes
- Scenario planning supports funding and capacity tradeoffs
- Investment prioritization aligns work to strategic objectives
- Capacity planning models demand against role-based or resource-based availability over time
- AI analytics surface risks, trends, and anomalies
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Planview helps portfolio teams pull requests, plans, people, and spend into a single, living view rather than having them scattered across tools. They triage demand, rank work, and tune roadmaps while monitoring capacity, risk, and cross-portfolio impacts through resource views, funding plans, and AI-powered portfolio insights.
Long-range resource views may need creative workarounds, partial capacity tweaks can feel tedious, and large groups strain some screens. Teams that run large portfolios often split exports and rely on external BI when API and OData limits are reached.
ServiceNow
ServiceNow is a workflow platform that includes Strategic Portfolio Management for steering IT demand and work. Portfolio teams use Strategic and Portfolio Planning workspaces to manage goals, scoring and prioritization, financial and resource plans, and dashboards aligned to a goal hierarchy.
ServiceNow Features:
- Strategic Planning Workspace for goals, plans, roadmaps
- Portfolio planning views for visual item scoring
- Scenario planning with financial impact comparison
- Role-based capacity planning
- Goal frameworks with progress tracking
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
ServiceNow uses portfolio tools that pull demand, projects, Agile work, resources, and finances into one place so teams can steer from shared data rather than slide decks. PMOs shape intake paths, ranking rules, roadmaps, and capacity views to match their playbook, then share workspaces with product, finance, and operations.
Those strengths also create work for portfolio teams. Data configuration and assignment setup determine scenario reliability and capacity rollups. Dashboards require tailoring and new users may need hands-on guidance in the Strategic Planning Workspace, especially when Agile metrics depend on epic-to-story links.
Workfront
Workfront is an enterprise work management platform that IT PMO teams use to decide what work starts, who does it, and how funds move. They lean on Business Cases, portfolio optimization, and role-based resource planning to link goals, budgets, and staffing into defensible portfolio choices.
Workfront Features:
- Business Cases that track costs, benefits, risk, and strategic alignment
- Portfolio Optimizer that prioritizes projects by value, cost, and alignment
- Resource Planner that compares role capacity against planned allocations
- Scenario Planner to model initiatives across multi‑year planning scenarios
- Interactive Dashboards to visualize portfolio KPIs and resource health
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Workfront brings intake, selection, and delivery into a single flow rather than scattered trackers. Teams shape requests into funding cases, review them in portfolios, then launch approved work with linked schedules, people, and budgets. Leaders can regularly see impact, risk, and progress across portfolios.
Workfront can require extra steps to connect incoming requests to the portfolio. Its resource planning relies on external reports to identify trends, and scenario planning focuses on monthly allocations, offering limited visibility into weekly details.
Wrike
Wrike is a work management platform that IT teams use to run requests, projects, and cross-team delivery. It supports IT and portfolio templates, custom item types for objectives and requests, advanced analytics and dashboards, workload capacity planning, and AI that surfaces risks and insights.
Wrike Features:
- Templates to standardize intake
- Custom item types to model objectives and requests
- Advanced analytics and dashboards that track portfolio health
- Workload view that supports capacity and resource planning
- AI features to surface risks and insights automatically
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Wrike gives IT portfolio teams a single workspace to capture demand, rank initiatives, plan schedules, and monitor delivery across multiple streams. Configurable dashboards track SLAs and ticket progress, while advanced analytics calculate portfolio KPIs. Structured request forms centralize intake, shared workload views reveal team capacity, and AI tools provide insights and summaries—all without leaving the core environment or juggling extra tools.
Some users find that complex workload timelines can feel cluttered. Scenario planning is more limited than in dedicated PPM tools, and request form logic may not support all advanced role-based conditions without workarounds.
Best IT Portfolio Management Software Comparison Table
Platform | Intake | Prioritization | Roadmaps | Capacity | Scenarios | Financials | Strategy Link | Dependencies | Dashboards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Platform | |||||||||
| Smartsheet | Forms plus Control Center request workflows | Portfolio prioritization with configurable criteria and governance | Timeline views plus Control Center for centralized portfolio reporting | Resource Management for capacity planning and forecasting, used alongside Control Center | Duplicated sheets and filters for what-if views | Budget fields, rollups, integrations for financial data | Project tags and categories in reports; custom metadata | Cross-sheet links; manual dependency tracking | Executive dashboards, reports, and automated portfolio metrics |
| Asana | Forms plus rules route requests to projects | Portfolio custom fields, status, prioritization workflows defined in projects | Project timelines plus portfolio progress rollups | Portfolio Workload; effort values; drag-and-drop rebalance | Duplicated portfolios; limited isolated what-if modeling | Time summaries, integrations, budget via custom fields | Goals linked to portfolios and projects | Task dependencies; limited portfolio dependency mapping | Portfolio dashboards, summaries, and reporting exports |
| Clarity | Demand intake objects with approval gates | Prioritization and scoring within strategic planning and roadmaps | Investment roadmaps, milestones, portfolio timelines | Role-based allocations, utilization, and capacity planning | What-if portfolios using versions and constraints | Cost tracking, budgeting, alignment of financials to projects | Link investments to strategic objectives and execution | Investment dependencies, constraints, and critical path | Portfolio reporting, dashboards, audit-ready rollups |
| ClickUp | Forms create work; automations launch templates | Priority fields, custom statuses, portfolio sorting | Portfolios plus Timeline view across initiatives | Workload view; estimates; assignment-based allocations | Duplicate views and templates; manual comparisons | Time tracking, custom fields for budget, integrations | Goals and Portfolios connect work to targets | Task dependencies; limited cross-portfolio visuals | Dashboards with widgets; portfolio health rollups |
| Jira Align | Initiative intake tied to strategy and portfolios | Lean prioritization across portfolios and value streams | Portfolio roadmaps plus PI planning views | Team capacity planning for increments and sprints | Alternative roadmaps; limited classic what-if separation | Spend vs investment visibility | Strategy-to-execution mapping; OKR alignment | Cross-team dependency visualization and management | Real-time progress, risk, alignment dashboards |
| Meisterplan | Import pipelines; centralized portfolio backlog | KPI scoring, ranking, portfolio balancing | Visual portfolio roadmaps with timeline views | Role and resource capacity planning allocations | Isolated scenarios; plan-of-record comparisons | High-level financial insights and planning fields; not full ERP cost control | Strategic alignment fields and value scoring | Milestone rather than task dependency links | KPIs, utilization, scenario comparison reporting |
| Microsoft Planner | Tasks via Teams, templates, and simple request capture | Buckets, labels, priority; lightweight governance | Premium Timeline (Gantt) view with project markers | Premium team workload and people management | Copy elements of plans manually; no isolated scenarios | Premium custom fields, enhanced reporting views | Goals feature ties plans to objectives | Premium task dependencies and critical path | Premium reports, basic charts |
| monday.com | Forms plus automations create items and projects | Customizable columns like status and priority; board automations and rules | Timeline/Gantt plus portfolio dashboards | Workload widget, capacity by person and team | Board duplication and baseline comparisons | Budget columns, time tracking, and finance integrations | Goal & OKR tracking via boards and dashboards | Dependency column; cross-board limits | All Projects Dashboard rolls up to 200 boards |
| Planview | Demand intake with scoring, prioritization, and approval workflows | Investment prioritization using objective scoring and scenario analysis | Multidimensional roadmaps across portfolios | Real-time demand versus capacity resource planning | What-if modeling with time-phased constraints | Planned vs actuals tracking, forecasting | Link investments to business outcomes | Program relationships and dependency visibility | Portfolio analytics; financial snapshots; exec dashboards |
| ServiceNow | Demand management with centralized intake, scoring, and prioritization | Portfolio planning with scoring and governance | Strategic and portfolio planning workspaces | Resource allocation and capacity across portfolios | Portfolio scenarios vary by licensing | Financial planning supported, varies by workspace and configuration | Align work to strategy on one platform | Linking demands and projects into portfolios | Now Platform dashboards and portfolio reporting |
| Workfront | Request queues and customs forms with auto-routing | Portfolio Optimizer scoring with business cases | Portfolio and program organization with project grouping | Resource Planner plus Workload Balancer | Portfolio Optimizer comparisons; scenario planning | Budgets, planned hours, and financial fields in portfolio management | Align initiatives via portfolios and programs | Task predecessors; cross-project support | Reports, dashboards, and proofing progress analytics |
| Wrike | Dynamic request forms launch projects and workflows | Workflow automation, portfolio stages, prioritization | Interactive Gantt charts with multiple projects | Role-based resource planning across the portfolio | Blueprints and reusable templates; limited isolated what-if | Time tracking, budgeting tools | Custom item types and fields for structuring data | Task dependencies, cross-project links | Dashboards and analytics; rollups of project data |
How to Choose the Best IT Portfolio Management Software
To choose the best IT portfolio management software, start by building a clear framework that aligns with how your PMO plans, funds, and staff work. Establish evaluation criteria and test scenarios. Talk to vendors and teammates and document what matters most. Create a timeline and focus on governance, capacity, scenarios, and reporting trust.
- Define Evaluation Framework
Begin by outlining your top portfolio goals, such as faster demand triage, fewer priority swings, more precise roadmaps, better capacity forecasts, tighter budget control, or stronger value tracking. List required standards, such as single sign-on, audit logs, and role-based access. Then gather input from the groups who request, approve, fund, staff, or deliver work.
Ask PMO leads, product owners, app owners, finance partners, delivery leads, security teams, and exec sponsors for the top features they need. Define non-negotiables, such as keeping planning scenarios separate, tracking team capacity over time, portfolio rollups, or budget controls. Align on what data must be trusted, who owns it, and what must sync with other systems.
- Establish Evaluation Criteria and Test Scenarios
Build tests that match real portfolio work. Evaluate how the tool captures demand, scores work, routes approvals, and turns choices into roadmaps. Test capacity by role and team, including placeholders, part-time rules, and time-off calendars. Run a what-if scenario that shifts budget or staffing mid-cycle, and measure how clearly the impact is evident.
You can also test reporting depth, dependency mapping, integration coverage, permission controls, and audit trails. Measure how well dashboards roll up from delivery data without manual cleanup. Track the setup time, learning curve, and the weekly upkeep needed to keep plans current.
- Questions to Ask Vendors
Have vendors walk through a real portfolio scenario from your PMO. Ask what is ready out of the box and what needs setup, add-ons, or services. Check whether different scenarios are kept distinct. Test capacity logic and financial feeds. Make sure integrations are robust and confirm whether system upgrades could break integrations or require rework. Review security controls, audit trails, support tiers, and admin tooling.
Here are some questions to consider asking:
- How do you separate plan-of-record from what-if scenarios?
- How does capacity handle roles, part-time staff, and shared teams?
- How do budgets support time-phased forecasts and actuals feeds?
- What dependency views exist across teams, apps, and vendors?
- Which integrations are native, and which require a custom build?
- Questions to Ask Your Internal Team
Your team can reveal gaps that are not revealed by demonstrations. Ask your team where processes are slow or break down, what the most reliable and unreliable data is, and if any approvals stall. Identify tools that must connect day one, and define ownership for each key data field.
Here are some questions to consider asking:
- Where do we lose time in intake and approvals?
- Which plans break when priorities shift mid-quarter?
- What data do leaders trust least today, and why?
- Which teams need capacity views, and at what detail?
- What would make this system worth using each week?
- Suggested Evaluation Steps and Timeline
Shortlist two or three options and run a structured pilot with the same scenarios, the same data, and the same reviewers. Score each tool using your criteria and record the setup time, weekly upkeep, and any required workarounds. Collect feedback from planners and delivery leads, and summarize tradeoffs, rollout steps, and a 60–90-day adoption plan.
Ready to accelerate your team's success?
Experience the difference a purpose-built, intelligent work management platform makes for complex work.
IT Portfolio Management Software FAQs
The difference between IT portfolio management software and project management tools is scope and decision focus. Project tools track tasks, timelines, and deliverables. IT portfolio tools manage demand, prioritization, roadmaps, capacity, funding, and tradeoffs across many initiatives. This helps leaders steer investment choices.
Which IT portfolio management features help reduce security and compliance risks?
Role-based access, audit logs, and gated approvals across intake and prioritization help reduce security and compliance risk. Standard templates enforce required fields and reviews. Integration controls keep data consistent across systems. Dashboards surface overdue controls, policy exceptions, and high-risk dependencies.
IT portfolio management software should integrate with dev and ops tools through reliable, two-way sync. Status, dates, owners, and links should flow automatically between systems. The portfolio should remain the source for priorities, funding, and capacity. Look for strong APIs, native connectors, SSO, audit logs, and clear conflict rules.
No, Jira alone usually cannot handle enterprise IT portfolio management needs. It performs well for delivery tracking. However, enterprise portfolios also need governance for intake, funding, and financial controls. They need capacity and scenario modeling. They also require cross-portfolio governance, which often requires Jira Align or a dedicated ITPPM suite.
Disclaimer: The information found in this comparison article is sourced from vendor websites, community boards, and some third-party user reviews. AI tools were used to help conduct research.